Zaiets Valentyna
PHD, Associate Professor,
Boris Grinchenko University of Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/StudLing2018.13.92-105
ABSTRACT
The productivity of word-formation types of the verbs has been examined. The analysis of verbal prose formants (usedin Y. Hutsalo’s prose) has been made. The examples confirmed the normative way of verbal wordformation during the period of 80-s years of the previous century. The role and the meaning of formants in verbal models’ formation have been shown. The attention has been focused on the verbal affixes in fiction. The role of word-formation formants for conveying the productivity of action, process, and state has been revealed. The connotative meanings of word-formation means in the text of art prose has been clarified. The role of formant for designation of the beginning of action, dynamism of action, completeness of action has been defined. The role of affixes for designation of non-repeating immediate action, qualitative characteristic of onetime action, procedurality of action has been proven. The formants used for transferring of the qualitative nomination of one-time complete action have been specified. The seldom used by the author affixes, which were used for the explication of a negative evaluation of action reaction effect have been looked upon. Often used formants for producing the word-formation types of verbs in the fiction text have been designated. The possibility of a verb to transfer the dynamics of action has been proved with the examples.
Key words: affix, derivative, derivative potential, verb, dynamics, normativity, completeness of action, Ukrainian linguistic studies, paradigm, procedurality, word-formation means, formant.
REFERENCES
- Babakova, O. V. «Semantichna struktura ta funkcіonuvannja dієslіv zvuchannja.» Avtoref. dis. kand. fіlol. nauk, Zaporіzhzhja, 2007.
- Vstup do movoznavstva: pidruchnuk, І.О. Holubovs‘ka, S. M. Luchkanin, V. F. Chemes tа іn.; zа rеd І. О. Holubovska (Kyi’v, VZ Akakdemija), 320.
- Huzalo,Je. P. Poluvanna z honchum psom (Kyi’v, 1980), 288.
- Gorodens’ka, K. G., Kravchenko, M. V. Slovotvіrna struktura slova (vіdіmennі derivati) (Kyi’v, Nauk. Dumka, 1981), 198.
- Greshhuk, V. i dr. Ukrajins’kij vіdprikmetnikovij slovotvіr (Іvano-Frankіvs’k, Plaj, 1995), 208.
- Zaiets, V. G. «Stilіstichnі funkzіji slovotvorchih zasobіv dіjeslіv u hudozhn’omu diskursі Marka Vovchka.» Naukovij vіsnik Mіzhnarodnogo gumanіtarnogo unіversitetu, Serija Fіlologіja 19 (2015): 17–19.
- Kots,T. A. Literaturna norma u funktsionalno–stylovii i strukturniiparadyhmi (Kyi’v, Lohos, 2010), 303.
- Kushlik, O. «Kontinuum slovotvіrnih znachen’ derivatіv verbal’noji zonu tipovoji slovotvіrnoji paradigmi vіdsubstantivnih dіjeslіv іz semantikoju “obrobljati objekt nazvanoju tvіrnim іmennikom rechovinoju”.» Rіdnij kraj 1 (2014): 63–69.
- Kushlik, O. «Slovotvіrna paradigmatika vіdsubstantivnih dіjeslіv zі slovotvіrnim znachennjam “perebuvati v psihіchnomu stanі, nazvanomu tvіrnoju osnovoju”.» Aktual’nі pitannja gumanіtarnih nauk15 (2016): 180–188.
- Laguta, T. M. «Semantiko-tipologіchna harakteristika vіdsubstantivnih dієslіv suchasnoї ukraїns’koї movi.» Avtoref. dis. kand. fіlol. nauk, Harkіv, 2003.
- 11. Mac’ko, L. І. i dr. Stilіstika ukraїns’koї movi: pіdruchnik (Kyi’v, Vishha shk, 2003), 462.
- Ovchinnіkova, І. І. «Leksiko-semantichna grupa dіjeslіv іntelektual’noji dіji v ukrajins’kіj lіteraturnіj movі.» Fіlologіchnі studії 9 (2013): 329–334.
- Ovchinnіkova, І. І. «Chasova lokalіzovanіst’ і fazovіst’ jak taksonomіchnі oznaki dієslіv dіji v ukrajins’kіj movі.» Sistema і struktura shіdnoslovjans’kih mov 6 (2012): 106–112.
- Pljushh, M. Ja. Gramatika ukraїns’koї movi. Morfemіka. Slovotvіr. Morfologіja: pіdruchnik (Kyi’v, Slovo, 2010), 327.
- Ponomariv, D. Kultura slova: Movnostylistychni porady: navch. posibnyk (Kyi’v, Lybid, 1999), 240.
- Ukrainska mova u ХХ storichchi: istoriia linhvotsydu: Dok. i materialy,: L.Masenko ta in.– Vyd. dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akad.», 2005), 399.