←2020. – Vol. 16
Maksym Olehovych Bondarenko
Master of Arts
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/StudLing2020.16.21-39
ABSTRACT
The article analyzes structural, word-formation and morphological peculiarities of Ukrainian oikonyms motivated by plant names. The conducted research of fixed in the «History of Cities and Villages of the Ukrainian SSR» and «Administrative and Territorial System of Ukraine» for 2019 (current list of Ukrainian oikonyms) confirmed the opinion of many linguists that the most productive way of creating names of settlements is the suffixation, on the other hand, far fewer units are formed with the help of compounding and prefixation. The following groups were distinguished on the basis of the analysis of oikonym-phrases formed from plant names: oikonym-phrase in which the noun is motivated by the plant name and the adjective indicates colour; oikonym-phrases in which one of the components is in the most cases an adjective motivated by plant name, and the main noun is one of the types of landscape, etc. We have considered some interesting oikonym-phrases which occur in all regions of Ukraine, for example, с. Кисла Дубина, с. Красні Лози, с. Мокра Рокитна etc. Some of the names of settlements have been significantly influenced by the Russian language, especially at the morphological level.
Key words: oikonym, toponym, vocabulary denominating plant names, word-formation peculiarities of oikonyms, morphological peculiarities of oikonyms.
REFERENCES
1. Bondarenko, M. O. «Ukrayinsˋki ojkonimyˋ, motyˋvovani nazvamyˋ roslyˋn, jak dzherelo vˋyvchennya istoriyi ukrayinsˋkoyi movyˋ [= Ukrainian oikonyms motivated by plant names as the sourse of studying history of the Ukrainian language].» Studia linguistica 14 (2019): 70-90 (In Ukr.).
2. Buchko, D. G. «Kilˋka shtryˋhiv do vyˋznachennya slovotvoru ukrayinsˋkyˋh ojkonimiv (na materiali ojkonimiv Zahidnogo Podillya) [= A few strokes to the definition of word formation of the Ukrainian oikonyms (on the material of the oikonyms of Western Podillya)].» Visnyˋk Pryˋkarpatsˋkogo naczionalˋnogo universyˋtetu imeni Vasyˋlya Stefanyˋka, Seriya: Filologiya ХХІХ–ХХХІ (2011): 90-93 (In Ukr.).
3. Gumec’ka, L. L. Naryˋs slovotvorchoyi syˋstemyˋ ukrayinsˋkoyi aktovoyi movyˋ XIV – XV st. [=An outline of the word-forming system of the Ukrainian language of the XIV – XV centuries] (Kyˋyiv, Vyˋdavnyˋcztvo AN URSR, 1958), 298 (In Ukr.).
4. Dobosh, V. I. Do pyˋtannya slovotvoru i pravopyˋsu nazv naselenyˋx punktiv [=On the question of word formation and spelling of the names of settlements] (Uzhgorod, 1962) (In Ukr.).
5. Karpenko, Ju. O. «Osoblyˋvosti gidronimichnogo slovotvoru (na materiali nazv richok Cherniveсяˋkoyi oblasti) [= Features of the hydronomic word formation (based on the names of the rivers of Chernivtsi region)].» Ukrayinsˋka dialektologiya i onomastyˋka (Kyˋyiv, Naukova dumka, 1964): 185–193 (In Ukr.).
6. Sklyarenko, O. M. «Deyaki zauvazhennya shhodo toponimiv vidantroponimnogo pohodzhennya (tyˋpologichnyj aspekt) [=Some remarks on toponyms of vidantroponymic origin (typological aspect)].» Slov’jansˋkyj zbirnyˋk XVI (2012): 220–233 (In Ukr.).
7. Chuchka, P. P. Do pytannja normalizacii’ slovotvoru vid toponimichnyh prykmetnykiv [=On the normalization of word formation of toponymic adjectives] (Uzhgorod, 1962) (In Ukr.).
8. Jacij, V. Ojkonimyˋ Ivano-Frankivshhyˋnyˋ z sufiksom -iv ta jogo riznovyˋdamyˋ [=Oikonyms of Ivano-Frankivsk region with the suffix -ів and its variants], http://kulturamovy.univ.kiev.ua/KM/pdfs/Magazine65-20.pdf.
9. Administratyvno-terytorial’nyj ustrij oblastej Ukrai’ny za 2019 r. [=Administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine for 2019], http://static.rada.gov.ua/zakon/new/NEWSAIT/ADM/ zmist.html, (In Ukr.).
10. Istorija mist i sil Ukrai’ns’koi’ RSR: u 26 t. [=History of Cities and Villages of the Ukrainian SSR], redkol.: P. T. Tron’ko (golov. red. ta in.); AN URSR, Instyˋtut istoriyi (Kyˋyiv, Golovna redakciya URE AN URSR, 1967), «Poltavsˋka oblastˋ.» (1967), 1027; «Хarkivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1967), 664; «Vinnyˋczˋka oblastˋ.» (1972), 777; «Volyˋnsˋka oblastˋ.» (1970), 767; «Zhyˋtomyˋrsˋka oblastˋ.» (1973), 752; «Zaporizˋka oblastˋ.» (1970), 790; «Ivano-Frankivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1971), 640; «Кyˋyiv.» (1968), 587; «Odesˋka oblastˋ.» (1969), 930; «Lugansˋka oblastˋ.» (1968), 940; «Lˋvivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1968), 998; «Dnipropetrovsˋka oblastˋ.» (1969), 958; «Zakarpatsˋka oblastˋ.» (1969), 810; «Cherniveczˋka oblastˋ.» (1969), 704; «Doneczˋka oblastˋ.» (1970), 992; «Kyˋyivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1971), 791; «Myˋkolayivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1971), 798; «Xmelˋnyˋczˋka oblastˋ.» (1971), 708; «Kirovogradsˋka oblastˋ.» (1972), 816; «Xersonsˋka oblastˋ.» (1972), 688; «Cherkasˋka oblastˋ.» (1972), 788; «Chernigivsˋka oblastˋ.» (1972), 780; «Rovensˋka oblastˋ.» (1973), 680; «Sumsˋka oblastˋ.» (1973), 696; «Ternopilˋsˋka oblastˋ.» (1973), 664; «Kryˋmsˋka oblastˋ.» (1974), 833.