SOCIOLINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF TRANSLATING ENGLISH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS VOCABULARY IN UKRAINIAN MEDIA DISCOURSE

Karina Ye. Klimenchuk

Email:  8043875@stud.kai.edu.ua

Year 4 of Study Undergraduate,

State University «Kyiv Aviation Institute»

Larysa Vasylivna Liashenko

Email:  l.liashenko@knu.ua

ORCID ID: 0009-0008-6464-3167

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Assistant Professor,

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Liana Heorhiivna Budanova

Email:  liana.budanova@npp.kai.edu.ua

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4840-6224

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor,

Head of the Department of English Philology and Translation,

State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/StudLing2025.27.77-89


PDF (ENGLISH)


ABSTRACT

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the sociolinguistic aspects and specifics of translating English political correctness vocabulary in modern Ukrainian media discourse. The study’s relevance is driven by rapid changes in English communicative culture and the urgent need to adapt domestic translation strategies to modern ethical standards in Western society. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research relies on the linguistic relativity hypothesis and S. Pinker’s “euphemism treadmill”concept, which substantiates the cyclical nature of sensitive vocabulary renewal. To achieve the goal, a complex of methods was used: structural-functional analysis of theoretical foundations, comparative analysis of originals and translations, and contextual analysis of pragmatic functions. The empirical base consists of materials from leading media (The Guardian, The New York Times, BBC) for 2020–2024. As a result of the work, four dominant reproduction strategies have been systematized: euphemization, calque, descriptive translation, and cultural adaptation. The specificity of translation of racial nominations, inclusive language, and social status has been investigated. Significant discrepancies in gender representation were revealed: the striving for neutralization in English contrasts with active feminization in Ukrainian. Recent lexical shifts have been analyzed, in particular the transition from the term “homeless” to “unhoused”. It is concluded that the Ukrainian language is at the stage of “catch-up modernization”, integrating Western concepts. It is proven that the translator acts as a co-creator of new communication ethics. Prospects for further research are seen in the empirical analysis of the reception of new borrowings.

Keywords: political correctness, media discourse, euphemism treadmill, translation strategies, sociocultural adaptation, inclusive language, gender linguistics.


References:

  1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/59570521/Euphemism_and_Dysphemism_Language_Used_As_Shield_and_Weapon
  2. Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities. (2021). The report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities. UK Government Publishing. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6062ddb1d3bf7f5ce1060aa4/20210331_-CRED_Report-FINAL-_Web_Accessible.pdf
  3. Guardian staff reporter. (2015, October 15). Guardian style guide: G. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-style-guide-g
  4. Guardian staff reporter. (2023, July 20). Is it OK to use the word “homeless” – or should you say “unhoused”? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/20/homeless-unhoused-houseless-term-history
  5. Malesky, (2014, March 30). The journey from “colored” to “minorities” to “people of color”. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/03/30/295931070/the-journey-from-colored-to-minorities-to-people-of-color
  6. Meir, (2020, July 20). Why we will lowercase White. The Associated Press. https://www.ap.org/the-definitive-source/announcements/why-we-will-lowercase-white/
  7. National Center on Disability and Journalism. (2018). NCDJ style guide. Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Arizona State University. https://ncdj.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCDJ-STYLE-GUIDE-EDIT-2021-SILVERMAN.pdf
  8. Pinker, (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. dokumen.pub. https://dokumen.pub/the-blank-slate-the-modern-denial-of-human-nature-paperbacknbsped-0142003344-9780142003343.html
  9. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo zastosuvannia termina “osoba z invalidnistiu” ta pokhidnykh vid noho [On amendments to certain legislative acts of Ukraine regarding the use of the term “person with disability” and its derivatives]. (2018, October 2). Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2581-19#Text
  10. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
  11. Sapir, (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/409588
  12. Siegal, M., & Connolly, W. G. (2015). The New York Times manual of style and usage. dokumen.pub. https://dokumen.pub/the-new-york-times-manual-of-style-and-usage-2015nbsped.html
  13. Natsionalna komisiia zi standartiv derzhavnoi movy. (2019). Ukrainskyi pravopys.
    https://mova.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/19/2024/_2019.pdf
  14. Vyshnytska, (2020, April 10). Zaivi v misti: Zvidky bezdomnym chekaty dopomohy. Mistosite. https://mistosite.org.ua/articles/zaivi-v-misti-zvidky-bezdomnym-chekaty-dopomohy